Writ petition under Article 226 challenging an administrative order was dismissed by the High Court of Madras as it had been withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.08.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.No.24050 of 2008 and M.P.No.2 of 2008
V.Rajendran S/o.R.Vellaichamy Naidu ...Petitioner
-Vs.-
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondents in connection with the impugned order issued by the first respondent in G.O.(2D) No.558 Home (SC) Department dated 19.09.2008 (served on 25/09/2008) and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vignesh Raj for Mr.M.Muthappan
For Respondents : Mr.C.Selvaraj Government Advocate
O R D E R
Mr.M.Vignesh Raj, learned counsel representing the counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Virtual Court.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mk
To
1.The Secretary to Government Home (SC) Department Fort St. George, Chennai-9.
+1cc to Mr.M.Muthappan, Advocate, S.R.No.41329 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.41773
W.P.No.24050 of 2008
PL[co]
NSK 07/09/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Rajendran
The Secretary to Government Home (SC) Department
The Director General of Police
M. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
