R.Valavan Raja v. Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a dropped Charge Memo. The court found the petition infructuous and dismissed it. No order on costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.08.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.No.12580 of 2009
R.Valavan Raja
...Petitioner
-Vs.-
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent herein in his proceedings Ta.Pa.No.130/H3/2008 dated 21.12.2008 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Ms.S.Nirmala Daisy for M/s.A.Bala Daisy
For Respondents : Mr.C.Selvaraj Government Advocate
O R D E R
Ms.S.Nirmala Daisy, learned counsel for the sole writ petitioner and Mr.C.Selvaraj, learned State counsel for both the respondents are before this virtual Court.
dismissed as having become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kmi
To
W.P.No.12580 of 2009
SSD[co] NSK 13/09/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Valavan Raja
Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Salem District
Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Records Bureau, Salem
M. Sundar
C.J. DIG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court