,petitioner filed a writ petition seeking permission to continue his engineering course. The court dismissed the petition on grounds of efflux of time since 2013, deeming the relief irrelevant.
No relief granted; writ petition dismissed due to efflux of time and irrelevance of the sought direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.11987 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
Nabeel Nazar
...Petitioner Vs
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No.1 & 2 to permit petitioner to continue his course of B.Tech, Bio-Medical Engineering (BME) in the 3rd respondent's college and thereby ensure his Right to Education.
For Petitioner :Mr.Prakash Adiapadam
For Respondents :M/s.A.V.Bharathi [For R1 and R2]
Mr.Muthumani Doraisami [For R3]
O R D E R
The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to permit the petitioner to continue his course of B.Tech, Bio-Medical Engineering (BME) in the 3rd respondent's college.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub-Assistant Registrar
nti/jeni
To
Pondicherry - 605 014.
+1 CC to Mr.A.V. Bharathi, Advocate sr 59848 +1 CC to M/s. Muthumari Doraisami, Advocate sr 59729.
W.P.No.11987 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
NRL(CO) SP(01/12/2021)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue his B.Tech course after a delay of eight years.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nabeel Nazar
The Registrar, Pondicherry University
The Controller of Examination, Pondicherry University
The Principal, Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering & Technology
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
