Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

The State of Tamilnadu Vs Savithri — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

Home
Madras HC
2021
The State of Tamilnadu Vs SavithriThe State of Tamilnadu v. Savithri

Disposed

The State of Tamilnadu v. Savithri

Madras HC2 Sept 2021WA/583/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ appeal against a contempt order in a pension dispute was closed because the underlying writ petition had already been complied with.

What did the court decide?

Writ Appeal closed; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.09.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN AND

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A. NAKKIRAN

W.A.No. 583 of 2021 and C.M.P. No. 2464 of 2021

The State of Tamil Nadu,

Rep by its Principal Secretary,

Finance Department,

Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

The Director

Treasuries and Accounts.

Panagal Maligai, Saidapet,

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
The State of Tamil Nadu and Others
respondent
Savithri and Others

Coram

AI extract

S. Vaidyanathan

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 2 Sept 2021 · September
Registered: 12 Feb 2021
Case no.: WA/583/2021

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Vaidyanathan A.a.nakkiran

The Secretary to the Government Vs S.H.Vasanthakumari
1 Sept 2021
R.Geethanjali Vs The Deputy General Manager
1 Sept 2021
The Chairman Vs v. Lakshmikandhan
1 Sept 2021
K.Prabakaran Vs the State of Tamilnadu
2 Sept 2021

Cite this judgement

The State of Tamilnadu v. Savithri, WA/583/2021 (MAD), decided on 2 September 2021.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

S. Vaidyanathan and A.A. Nakkiran

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Writ Appeal closed; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Upon representation that the impugned order in the connected writ petition had been complied with, the High Court held that no further orders were required in the writ appeal, hence closing it.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Chennai 600 015. 3. The Joint Director

District treasury, Kancheepuram District.

The Treasury Officer, District treasury, Kancheepuram

District. ...Appellants

Vs.

Savithri

The Principal Accountant General, (A&E) Tamil Nadu,

Chennai 600 018. ....Respondents

Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letter Patent Act, to set aside the order dated 24.02.2020 passed in W.P.No.35771 of 2019.

Prayer in WP 35771/2019 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, pryaing to issue a Writ of certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records letter No. Na.Ka.7964 /2017A2 dated 17.5.2017 and 03.08.2017 sent by the fourth respondent to the first respondent quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent forthwith to revise P03 /3/1039506/PPO No.D0319506 dated 27.10.2017 and sanction family

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

pension to the petitioner from 9.5.1993 i.e the date following the date of death of her husband on 8.5.1993 and to draw arrears accordingly.

For Appellants : Mr.K.V.Sanjeevkumar,

Government Advocate

For Respondents : Mr.Patrick for R1

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.VAIDYANATHAN,J)

The Writ Appeal is filed against the order passed in W.P.No.35771 of 2019, dated 24.02.2020 in allowing the Writ Petition filed by the first respondent.

When this Appeal is taken up for hearing, it is represented by Mr.K.V.Sanjeevkumar, learned Government Advocate that the order passed in the Writ Petition in W.P.No.35771 of 2019 has been complied with. He has also produced the proceedings received by him from the Additional Director (Admin), O/o. Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts dated 01.09.2021.

In view of the same, no further orders are required in this Writ Appeal. Hence, this Writ Appeal is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar(CO)

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

arr

To

The Principal Accountant General, (A&E)

Tamil Nadu, Chennai 600 018.

The Principal Secretary,

Finance Department,

Government of Tamil Nadu,

Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Director Treasuries and Accounts, Panagal Maligai Saidapet, Chennai 600 015 4. The Joint Director, District Treasury, Kancheepuram District 5. The Treasury officer, District Treasury, Kancheepuram District +1CC to the Government Pleader, Sr.No.44871/2021 W.A.No.583 of 2021 SSV (CO) K.RK. (17.09.2021)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.A. Nakkiran

CNR

HCMA010200342021

Topic

Pension and Retirement Benefits

Bench

S. Vaidyanathan A.a.nakkiran

Disposal

CLOSED

S.T.Chellappa Vs the Director of School Edcation

2 Sept 2021

The Government of Tamilnadu, Vs N.Rajendran

2 Sept 2021