This Writ Appeal against a Single Judge's order directing the counting of 50% of service for pension calculation was dismissed. The Court found no error in the lower order and extended the time granted to authorities.
Appellants' Writ Appeal dismissed with a direction extending the time granted by the Single Judge for compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:01.09.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
WRIT APPEAL NO.2114 OF 2021
... Appellants/ Respondents 1, 3, 4 & 5
vs.
Prayer:-
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 29.01.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.No.2052 of 2020.
Prayer in W.P.No.2052 of 2020:-
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of order or Direction more fully in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to count the 50% of service rendered by the petitioner from 15/10/1985 to 04/10/1996 (10 years 11 months and 19 days) for the purpose of commutation of pension and other benefits based on the proposal submitted by the school management to the 5th respondent.
For Appellants
: Mr.K.V.Sajeev Kumar, Government Advocate
For Respondents : Mr.K.H.Ravikumar
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court delivered by S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.)
This Writ Appeal is directed against the order dated 29.01.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.No.2052 of 2020.
extended by two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
No costs. Consequently, connected C.M.P.No.13383 of 2021 is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
(aeb)
| To: | |
|---|---|
| 1. | The Accountant General (Pension), No.361, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018. |
| 2. | The Secretary to the Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. |
| 3. | The Director of School Education, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai 600 006. |
| 4. | The Chief Educational Officer, Kancheepuram. |
| 5. | The District Educational Officer, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai 600 044. |
| 6. | The Secretary R.Gladwin Gabriel, C.S.I. St.Thomas Higher Secondary School, No.47, Butt Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai 600 016. |
| +1cc +1cc |
to Mr.K.H.Ravikumar, Advocate, S.R.No.43755 to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.44557 |
| LN(CO PM/21 |
WRIT APPEAL No.2114 OF 2021 ) /09/2021 |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned Single Judge committed any error in ordering the counting of 50% of the petitioner's service for pension commutation.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Government of Tamil Nadu vs. M.MuthuramalingamReferred¶28
Government of Tamil Nadu vs. M.Muthuramalingam in W.A.No.3077 of 2019
The Secretary to the Government, School Education Department
The Director of School Education
The Chief Educational Officer, Kancheepuram
The District Educational Officer, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai
S.H.Vasanthakumari
The Accountant General (Pension), Chennai
S. VAIDYANATHAN
A. A. NAKKIRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
