Partly allowed

M.Karunambigai, v. a.Rajeshkumar

Madras HC19 Feb 2021TR CMP(MD)/320/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed a transfer petition under Section 24 CPC. It ordered that a divorce petition filed by the husband in Kangeyam be transferred to Karur where the wife resides, noting her convenience and the nature of proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The Hindu Marriage Act divorce petition (H.M.O.P.No.41 of 2020) pending in Kangeyam is withdrawn and transferred to Principal Subordinate Court, Karur. Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition allowed.

M.Karunambigai, Vs a.Rajeshkumar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

TR.C.M.P.(MD)No.320 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.02.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN TR.C.M.P.(MD)No.320 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD)No.7108 of 2020

¶3

M.Karunambigai : Petitioner /Respondent Vs. A.Rajeshkumar : Respondent /Petitioner

¶4

PRAYER:- The petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.41 of 2020 pending before the Subordinate Court, Kangeyam and transfer the same to Principal Subordinate Court, Karur.

¶5

For Petitioner :Mr.K.K.Samy For Respondent :No Appearance ****

¶6

ORDER

¶7

Wife seeks transfer of H.M.O.P.No.41 of 2020 pending on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kangeyam to Principal Subordinate Court, Karur. The said original petition has been filed by the husband seeking divorce under Section 13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

¶8

2.Despite service, the respondent is not appearing either in person or through Counsel duly instructed.

¶9

3.It is seen from the records that the wife is a resident of Karur and the husband is residing at Kangeyam. Considering the convenience of the wife and the fact that the proceedings are before a Subordinate Court, which does not require the presence of the parties for every hearing, H.M.O.P.No.41 of 2020 pending on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kangeyam, is withdrawn and transferred to the Principal Subordinate Court, Karur to be heard and disposed of in accordance with law.

¶10

4.The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶11

Assistant Registrar (Records)

¶12

// True Copy //

¶13

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

1/2

¶16

TR.C.M.P.(MD)No.320 of 2020

¶17

cmr

¶18

¶19

1.The Subordinate Judge, Kangeyam,Tiruppur District.

¶20

2.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Karur,Karur District.

¶21

+2 CC to M/s.K.K.SAMY, Advocate ( SR-6564[F] dated 22/02/2021 )

¶22

TR.C.M.P.(MD)No.320 of 2020 19.02.2021

¶23

smv(CO) KK(03.03.2021) 2P 5C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

2/2

M.Karunambigai, v. a.Rajeshkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Karunambigai, v. a.Rajeshkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Vanajarani Vs D.Anbalagan

Helan Janani Vs Arunkumar

Arun Karthick,S/O.Late.Ashok Vs a.Sulochana

Kruthiga, Vs R.Karthik

Petchiammal, Vs R.Peter

Chellammal (Died) Vs M.Suseela