Arun Karthick,S/O.Late.Ashok v. a.Sulochana
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure as withdrawn by the appellant.
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure as withdrawn by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD)No.288 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.02.2021
CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN S.A.(MD)No.288 of 2019
Arun Karthick
:Appellant
Vs
1.A.Sulochana 2.G.Duraisamy Naidu 3.Ravichandran
4.R.Amudha
:Respondents
PRAYER :- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree passed by the Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court) Palani, made in A.S.No.33 of 2015 dated 18.09.2017 in modifying the Judgment and Decree made in O.S.No.60 of 2008, dated 27.04.2015, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Palani.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Karthik For R1 : No appearance For R2 to R4 : Mr.R.Jegadeeswaran
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Second Appeal. He has also circulated a letter dated 10.02.2021 to that effect.
2.In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Assistant Registrar (CS-I)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
vrn
To
1.The Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court) Palani, 2.The Subordinate Court, Palani.
1/2
S.A.(MD)No.288 of 2019
Judgment made in S.A.(MD)No.288 of 2019 Dated 18.02.2021
VB (02.03.2021) 2P 6C
2/2
Arun Karthick
A.Sulochana
G.Duraisamy Naidu
Ravichandran
R.Amudha
R.Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court