Allowed

Helan Janani v. Arunkumar

Madras HC18 Feb 2021TR CMP(MD)/314/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge bench allowed the transfer of a Family Court maintenance petition from Chengalpattu to Tirunelveli for joint hearing, considering the petitioner's residence and custody proceedings pending in Tirunelveli.

What did the court decide?

I.D.O.P.No.56 of 2020 withdrawn from Family Court, Chengalpattu and transferred to Family Court, Tirunelveli to be heard along with G.W.O.P.No.81 of 2020.

Helan Janani Vs Arunkumar — Madras HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

TR.C.M.P.(MD)No.314 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.02.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶5

TR.C.M.P.(MD)No.314 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD)No.6997 of 2020

¶6

Helan Janani : Petitioner /Respondent

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Arunkumar : Respondent/Petitioner

¶9

PRAYER:- The petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the I.D.O.P.No.56 of 2020 on the file of the Family Court, Chengalpattu and to transfer it to the Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Anbarasu For Respondent : Mr.Uthayakumar for Mr.H.Arumugam ****

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Wife seeks transfer of I.D.O.P.No.56 of 2020 pending on the file of the Family Court, Chengalpattu to the Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶13

2.Transfer is sought for mainly on the ground of convenience, since the wife is a resident of Tirunelveli and she has to take care of her five years old child, who is affected by Autism.

¶14

3.Mr.Uthayakumar, learned Counsel representing Mr.H.Arumugam, learned Counsel for the respondent/husband would submit that the husband has launched proceedings for custody of the child in G.W.O.P.No.81 of 2020 on the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli. He would further submit that if both cares are heard together, the respondent/husband could attend both the cases at the Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶15

4.Considering the said reasonable request made by the learned Counsel for the respondent, I.D.O.P.No.56 of 2020 is withdrawn from the file of the Family Court, Chengalpattu, and transferred to the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli, to be heard and disposed of along with G.W.O.P.No.81 of 2020 pending on its file.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

TR.C.M.P.(MD)No.314 of 2020

¶19

5.The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar(AD-II)

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶24

cmr

¶25

To 1.The Judge, Family Court, Chengalpattu. 2.The Judge, Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶26

+1 CC to M/s.H.ARUMUGAM, Advocate ( SR-6148[F] dated 19/02/2021 )

¶27

TR.C.M.P.(MD)No.314 of 2020 18.02.2021

¶28

ES(CO) TR(01.03.2021) 2P 4C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/2

Helan Janani v. Arunkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Helan Janani v. Arunkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deivadharshini @ Alagumeenal Vs Karthik

K.Soman Vs Pushpavalli

Natarajan Vs Shantha

V.Vanajarani Vs D.Anbalagan

Arun Karthick,S/O.Late.Ashok Vs a.Sulochana

R.Jhansy, Vs P.Vignesh