Sathya v. Karthikeyan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court allowed the transfer petition under Section 24 CPC. Proceedings in the Family Court, Srivilliputhur were transferred to the Sub Court, Sankarankoil due to the wife's residence location and convenience for effective hearings.
What did the court decide?
HMOP No.123 of 2020 withdrawn from Family Court, Srivilliputhur and transferred to Sub Court, Sankarankoil; Family Court directed to transmit papers.
What the court decided
Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.22 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.03.2021 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.22 of 2021 and C.M.P(MD) No.454 of 2021
Sathya ... Petitioner/Respondent -VsKarthikeyan ... Respondent/Petitioner
Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.123 of 2020, on the file of the Family Court, Srivilliputhur and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Sankarankoil.
O R D E R
The wife seeks transfer of HMOP No.123 of 2020, pending on the file of the Family Court, Srivilliputhur to the Sub Court, Sankarankoil.
2.Transfer is sought for mainly on the ground of convenience, as the wife is a resident of Karaisalkulam, Sankarankovil.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the respondent has strongly objected for transfer being ordered.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether High Court of Madras ought to order transfer of proceedings from Family Court, Srivilliputhur to Sub Court, Sankarankoil based on convenience of parties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sathya
- respondent
Karthikeyan
Coram
R.Subramanian
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court