B.Ravi Parameshwaran, v. Mr.Ponmudi, Tamil Nadu State Transport
Madras HCCONT P(MD)/178/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the petitioner challenged the respondent for wilful disobedience of a previous court order mandating the settlement of retirement benefits. The respondent counsel submitted that the order dated 19.12.2018 had been complied with. The Court recorded this statement and closed the contempt petition without further punishment.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed upon the court recording the respondent's submission that the prior order was complied with.