The Madurai Bench dismissed the Civil Revision Petition filed by the tenant opposing the eviction order of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, confirming the order and directing the tenant to vacate the premises.
Confirmation of the order dated 30.01.2009 and direction to the tenant to vacate premises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(MD). No.808 of 2009
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Thursday, the Fourth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty One PRESENT
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.SUBRAMANIAN
CRP(MD). No.808 of 2009
K.MURALIDHARAN ...Petitioner/Respondent/Respondent/Tenant
Vs
Prayer :-
Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 18/60 as amended by 1/80 against the order dated 30.01.2009 passed in R.C.A.No.6 of 2008 on the file of Rent Control Appellate Authority/Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram, reversing the order dated 31.01.2008 made in R.C.O.P.No.10 of 2007 on the file of Rent Control Authority/District Munsif-cum-Magistrate, Rameswaram.
Decree: Civil Revision Petition coming on for hearing on this day and upon perusing the grounds of Petition, the order of the Lower Court and the material papers in this Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. K.Govindarajan, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Mr. R.Sundar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1,2 and 5 and none appeared for the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 and 7 and in pursuance of the affidavit filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner dated 19.03.2021 in USR No.8047 of 2021 stating that he will vacate and hand over the premises on or before 04.03.2022 to the respondents without fail, this Court while dismissing the Civil Revision Petition and confirming the order passed by the Tribunal below, doth order and decree as follows:
1 That, the order datetd 30.01.2009 passed in R.C.A.No.6 of 2008 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority/Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram, reversing the order dated 31.01.2008 passed in R.C.O.P.No.10 of 2007 on the file of the Rent Control Authority / District Munsif-cum-Magistrate, Rameswaram be and hereby is confirmed.
2 That the tenant herein / petitioner be and hereby is directed to vacate the premises and hand over the same to the landlords https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ without driving them to execution and
1/2
CRP(MD). No.808 of 2009
3 That there be no costs in this Civil Revision Petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CSII)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
TO
1 The Rent Control Appellate Authority / Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram. 2 The Rent Control Authority / District Munsif -cum- Magistrate, Rameswaram
Copy to:
The Record Keeper, V.R. Section,(2C) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai (+2copies)
ORDER DATED : 04.03.2021 ========================== DECREE ========================== CRP(MD). No.808 of 2009 Nature of Decree : Dismissing the Civil Revision Petition against order dated 30.01.2009 made in R.C.A.No.6 of 2008 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority/Subordinate Judge, Ramanathapuram,reversing the order dated 31.01.2008 made in R.C.O.P.No.10 of 2007 on the file of the Rent Control Authority/District Munsif-cum-Magistrate, Rameswaram etc., as stated within.
KB(31.03.2021) 2P 5C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition challenging the eviction order of the Rent Control Appellate Authority should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Muralidharan
Anandhavalli
Mahadevan
Paruvatham
Vijyalakshmi
Ramanathan
R.Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
