Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2003 TCMP No. 259 of 2003 in T.C.( A )…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TCMP. No. 259 of 2003
TCMP No. 259 of 2003 in T.C.(A) (SR)No. 42979 of 2003
R. MAHADEVAN, J. and
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned standing counsel appearing for the petitioner/appellant submitted that notice has been sent to the respondent through substituted service. However, a copy of the paper publication has not been made available for filing the affidavit of service. He further submitted that the tax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit and hence, the delay may be condoned and the appeal may be directed to be listed for withdrawal on account of low tax effect.
2.Taking note of the aforesaid submission made on the side of the petitioner / appellant, the delay of 29 days in filing the above appeal is condoned and the petition is ordered accordingly.
J.] 25.11.2021
Maya/Dhk
Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal and post the same after a week.
Coram
R. MAHADEVAN
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court