This judgment condones the delay of 42 days in filing writ appeals seeking regularisation of service, noting no objection from respondents. The petitions were listed for admission and number assignment.
The delay of 42 days is condoned; petitions listed for admission and numbered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP.Nos.18784, 18798 & 18827 of 2021 in WA.SR.Nos.140115, 140116 & 140117 of 2019
CMP.Nos.18784, 18798 & 18827 of 2021 in WA.SR.Nos.140115, 140116 & 140117 of 2019
R. MAHADEVAN, J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
These petitions are filed by the petitioner / appellant seeking to condone the delay of 42 days in filing the above WA.SR.Nos.140115, 140116 & 140117 of 2019.
[R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 24.11.2021
av
Note : Registry is directed to number the Appeals, if they are otherwise in order and list them for admission, after printing the name of Mr.C.Prakasam as counsel for the Respondents.
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 42 days in filing the regularisation petitions is condonable.
R. MAHADEVAN
Respondents
MAHADEVAN R.
SHAFFIQ MOHAMMED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
