Court condoned the delay of 762 days in filing the Tax Case Appeal after the learned standing counsel submitted that the tax effect was below the threshold limit, dispensing with formal notice to the respondent.
Delay of 762 days was condoned and the petition was allowed to be listed for withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
T.C.M.P.No.178 of 2004 in TC(A). SR.No.60483 of 2003
R. MAHADEVAN, J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
This petition is filed by the petitioner/Appellant seeking to condone the delay of 762 days in filing the above Tax Case Appeal.
2.Though notice was ordered to the respondent through court as well as privately, as early as on 24.08.2004, the petitioner / appellant has not taken any steps to complete the service, till date. No affidavit of service has also been filed.
3.However, today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned standing counsel appearing for the petitioner / appellant submits that the tax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit and hence, the delay may be condoned and the appeal may be directed to be listed for withdrawal on account of low tax effect.
4.Taking note of the aforesaid submission made on the side of the petitioner / appellant, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered accordingly.
[R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 25.11.2021
Maya/Dhk
Note: Office to number the appeal and post the same after a week.
1/1
PETITIONER/APPELLANT
RESPONDENT
R. MAHADEVAN
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
