Sivanupandian v. M.S.Pandian
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the appellant, despite the appeal being listed after printing the appellant's name.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the appellant.
What the court decided
S.A.No.308 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.12.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
S.A.(MD)No.308 of 2005
Sivanupandian ... Appellant/Respondent/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.M.S.Pandian ... 1st Respondent/Appellant/1st Defendant 2.Innasi ... 2nd Respondent/2nd Respondent/2nd Defendant
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 20.04.2004 in A.S.No.114 of 2003, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sankarankovil reversing the judgment and decree dated 14.08.2003 in O.S.No.278 of 2000, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Sankarankovil..
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sivanupandian
- respondent
M.S.Pandian
- respondent
Innasi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court