Dismissed
Ponnammal v. Saraswathy
Madras HCSA(MD)/193/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed as abated on grounds that the appellants had passed away and their legal heirs did not respond to the notice to implead themselves.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as abated. No costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A.(MD)No.193 of 2005
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED : 03.12.2021
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
¶6
S.A.(MD)No.193 of 2005
¶7
- Ponnammal
¶8
- Mohandoss ... Appellants/Appellants/Defendants
¶9
-vs-
¶10
- Saraswathy
¶11
- Sakthivel
¶12
Son of Periyannan
¶13
Through his Power of Attorney Agent Saraswathy ... Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Ponnammal
- appellant
Mohandoss
- respondent
Saraswathy
- respondent
Sakthivel
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court