7.The trial Court found that 3rd item of suit schedule property has been allotted to one Poolu Konar under Exhibit A1 family arrangement. Under Exhibit B3, the said Poolu Konar had executed a sale deed in favour of one Angappa Konar for an extent of 4 cents. Thereafter, the said sale deed has been cancelled by the Poolu Konar under Exhibit A10. In the result, 4 cents of property which was allotted to Poolu Konar under Exhibit A1 family arrangement was retained by the said Poolu Konar. One Nallakannu Konar was allotted another 4 cents under Exhibit A1 family arrangement. The legal heirs of the said Nallakannu Konar had sold away the said 4 cents to Poolu Konar under Exhibit A11. The said Poolu Konar became owner of 8 cents, thereafter, the said Poolu Konar has executed Exhibit A1 sale deed in favour of his son namely Perumal Konar for 8 cents of property. The present plaintiffs are the legal heirs of the said Perumal Konar. The trial Court after going through the documents and revenue records, came to the conclusion that the plaintiffs are the owners of the properties and they are in possession of the suit schedule properties. The trial Court also came to the conclusion that the 3rd item of suit schedule property is in enjoyment of the plaintiffs and decreed the suit as prayed for.
