Kandasamy v. Lakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal filed by Kandasamy against a decree and judgment was dismissed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras as withdrawn by the appellant via a memo.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.10.2021 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No.94 of 2010 and C.M.P.No.19280 of 2016 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 Kandasamy ... Appellant vs. 1.Lakshmi 2.Karpagam 3.Sudha 4.Saranya ..Respondents 1 to 4/Plaintiffs 5.Saraswathi 6.Banumathi ... Respondents 5 & 6/2nd & 3rd Defendant Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 16.07.2009 in A.S. No.93 of 2006 on the file of the Sub Court, Madurantagam, upholding the decree and judgment dated 07.02.2005 in O.S. No.97 of 1996, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurantagam.
For Appellant : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Respondents : No appearance JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this second appeal. He has also filed a Memo dated 30.09.2021 to that effect.
2.Recording the above said submission and the memo, this second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True copy//
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kandasamy
- respondent
Lakshmi
- respondent
Karpagam
- respondent
Sudha
- respondent
Saranya
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court