K.Chinnasami v. K.Venkataraman
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge bench dismissed the second appeal in a civil suit as abated because the sole appellant died without his legal heirs being brought on record before the court.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as abated. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :29.09.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTIC E R.HEMALATHA
S.A.NO. 1217 OF 2008
K.Chinnasami ... Appellant/Plaintiff Vs.
1.K.Venkataraman 2.K.Ramasami 3.K.Raju 4.K.Krishnan 5.Pappammal
... Respondents/Defendants
(Respondents 3 and 5 already absent set ex parte in A.S.No.49 of 2005 Not necessary parties in this second appeal)
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure praying to set aside the decree and judgment dated 30.11.2007 passed in A.S.No.49 of 2005 of the Subordinate Court at Dharmapuri, upholding the decree and judgment dated 11.04.2005 passed in O.S. No.434 of 1994 on the file of District Munsif Court at Dharmapuri.
For Appellant : Mr.Saravana Kumar For R2 : Mr.R. Sunil Kumar for Mr.C.Anandharaman. R3 & R5 : Ex parte
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Chinnasami (deceased)
- respondent
K.Venkataraman
- respondent
K.Ramasami
- respondent
K.Raju
- respondent
K.Krishnan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court