Sarojini v. N.Palani
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure was dismissed for default as no representatives appeared for either parties after the death of their counsels.
What did the court decide?
None granted; appeal dismissed for default due to non-appearance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.09.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTIC E R.HEMALATHA
S.A.NO.1128 OF 2009
- Sarojini 2. Indirani 3. Thiagarajan 4. Vasantha 5. Soundari ... Appellants/Plaintiffs .Vs.
- N.Palani 2. N.Jagannathan 3. A.Annapoorani 4. D.Baskaran 5. D.Thulasi 6. D.Shoban Babu 7. D.Ramesh 8. Thamizhselvi 9. Thamizarasi ... Respondents/Defendants
PRAYER:-
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 21.11.2008 in A.S.No.51 of 2006, on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Ranipet, confirming the decree and judgment dated 29.08.2005, in O.S.No.101 of 2004, on the file of the District Munsif, Ranipet.
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance
JUDGMENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sarojini
- appellant
Indirani
- appellant
Thiagarajan
- appellant
Vasantha
- appellant
Soundari
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court