Palanisamy v. Manicka Boyan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras allowed the second appeal and set aside the judgment and decree of the lower courts. No costs were awarded to either party.
What did the court decide?
Set aside the judgment and decree in O.S.No.278 of 1998 and A.S.No.24 of 2007; no order as to cost.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
WEDNESDAY THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
S.A.No.869 of 2008
1.Palanisamy
- 2.Sampath Kumar
3.Prakash
4.Easwari ...Appellants/Appellants/Defendants Vs.
1.Manicka Boyan
2.Bangaru Boyan
3.Kannammal
4.Sarasammal
5.Rajammal 6.K. Selvam 7.Papathiammal
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the judgment and decree in the underlying original suit and the first appeal should be set aside and the second appeal allowed.
Whether the decree regarding the property at Modachur Village should be varied in favor of the appellants.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Palanisamy
- appellant
Sampath Kumar
- appellant
Prakash
- appellant
Easwari
- respondent
Manicka Boyan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court