Chinna Sellappa v. S. Rajagopal
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal filed by appellants to set aside a decree confirming a prior judgment. Due to default in appearing at hearing on the date fixed, the Second Appeal is dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
S.A.No.379 of 2008
- Chinna Sellappa 2. Sellapan 3. Kolandaiswamy ... Appellants
Vs
- S.Rajagopal 2. S.Sellappan 2. P.Sellappan ... Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of code of Civil Procedure praying to set aside the Decree and Judgment dated 07.08.2003 passed in A.S.No.13 of 2001 by the Leared Subordinate Judge, Mettur confirming the decree and judgment dated 21.12.2000 passed in O.S.No.507 of 1991 by the learned District Munsif, Mettur.
For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.N.Santhyamoorthy for R1 Mr.N.S.Sivakumar for R3 No appearance for R2
J U D G M E N T
When the matter was listed on 21.06.2021, there was no representation for both sides. Therefore, the matter came up for hearing on 05.07.2021. Once again, there was no representation for the appellants, however, the learned counsel for the respondents was present. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” on 07.07.2021. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 07.07.2021, there was no representation on either side and the matter is directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Once again, there is no representation on either side and therefore, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chinna Sellappa
- appellant
Sellapan
- appellant
Kolandaiswamy
- respondent
S.Rajagopal
- respondent
S.Sellappan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court