Second Appeal filed without the appellant's appearance was heard. The court dismissed the appeal for default due to the absence of representation and issued no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
S.A.No.1341 of 2008
Savithiriammal
...Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs
A.Venkatachalam ...Respondent/Defendent
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.90 of 2005 dated 25.02.2008 by the Subordinate Court, Thirupattur reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.121 of 1995 dated 31.08.2005 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi, praying that the same may be set aside and the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi passed in O.S.No.121 of 1995 dated 31.08.2005 may be restored.
For Appellant : No Appearance
For Respondent : Mr.T.R.Rajaraman
J U D G M E N T
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 29.06.2021, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. Once again, on 06.07.2021, there was no representation on the side of the Appellant and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” on 14.07.2021. Even today, there is no representation on the side of the Appellant. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kal
To
Copy to
The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.
S.A.No.1341 of 2008
CP[co] NSK 03/08/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Savithiriammal
A. Venkatachalam
P.T. Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
