The High Court of Madras dismissed a second appeal abated due to the death of the appellant, noting that legal representatives had not been brought on record.
Second appeal dismissed as abated. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
SA No.724 of 2001 and CMP No.7560 of 2001
Dhanalakshmi Ammal
... Appellant
versus
... Respondents
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 26.02.2001 and made in A.S. No.94 of 1998 on the file of Additional Subordinate Court, Tiruvannamalai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 03.08.1998 and made in O.S. No.479 of 1988 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Tiruvannammalai.
JUDGMENT
(Heard Video Conference)
The learned counsel for the appellant submits on instructions that the appellant died long time back. Since, steps have not been taken to bring on record the Legal Representatives for the deceased appellant, the Second Appeal is
dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
vsi2
To
SA No.724 of 2001
GP(CO) SU(16/08/2021)
Dhanalakshmi Ammal
Muthukrishnan
Muralikrishnan
Thirumalaikanthan
Lakshmi Kantham ammal
Thayar @ Poongothai ammal
Abdul Quddhos
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
