Senthil Kumar v. Kaliyan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel reported no instructions and appellants failed to effect substituted service.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
SA No.1046 of 2002
1. Senthil Kumar 2. Panchalai ... Appellants
versus 1. Kaliyan 2. Murugesan ... Respondents
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Judge, Villupuram passed in A.S. No.212/97, on 27.07.99 reversing the judgment and decree of the Additional District Munsif - I, Ulundurpet, passed in O.S. No.183/95, dated 29.04.1997.
For Appellants : Mr.L.Prabhakar
JUDGMENT
(Heard Video Conference)
The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Senthil Kumar
- appellant
Panchalai
- respondent
Kaliyan
- respondent
Murugesan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court