Dismissed
Manickkammal v. Muniyan
Madras HCSA/664/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A second appeal filed by an appellant in the absence of the appellant, who has not appeared or filed any representation.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶2
DATED : 20.09.2021
¶3
CORAM
¶4
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
¶5
S.A.No.664 of 2005
and
C.M.P.No.9317 of 2005
¶6
Manickkammal ... Appellant
¶7
Vs.
1.Muniyan
¶8
2.Kandan
¶9
3.Varadhan
¶10
4.Natesan
¶11
5.Kandan
¶12
6.Kumaresan ... Respondents
¶13
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil
Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 23.07.1998 in
A.S. No.16 of 1998, on the file of the III Additional District
Court, Dharmapuri District, Krishnagiri, reversing the decree
and judgment dated 28.11.1997, in O.S. No.31 of 1995, on the
file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Manickkammal
- respondent
Muniyan
- respondent
Kandan
- respondent
Varadhan
- respondent
Natesan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court