Partly allowed

G.Karthik v. State, Represented by

Madras HC20 Sept 2021CRL MP/7989/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras modified a bail condition requiring the petitioner to report to a specific police station in Salem, allowing him to comply with multiple pending cases by reporting daily to the Kolathur Police Station instead of the originally specified Mangalam Police Station.

What did the court decide?

Modified bail condition to require appearance at Kolathur Police Station, Salem daily, instead of Mangalam Police Station, Tiruppur.

G.Karthik Vs State, Represented by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Twentieth day of September Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs Justice R. HEMALATHA

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.7989 of 2021 IN CRL OP.9335/2021

¶7

G.KARTHIK [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs

¶8

STATE, REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALAM POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT. CRIME.NO.119/2021

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to modify the condition that the petitioner shall report to the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kolathur Police Station, Salem District in connection with Crime No.74/2021 instead of reporting to the Inspector of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Tiruppur District.

¶10

Order: This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. N.VIJAYA BASKER, Advocate for the Petitioner and of MR.V.J.PRIYADARSANA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶11

The present petition has been filed seeking to modify the condition passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.9304 of 2021, dated 19.05.2021. While enlarging the petitioner on bail, this Court directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent Police Station daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶12

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that apart from the present case, two other cases in Crime No.76/2021 of Sultanpet Police Station, Coimbatore District and Crime No.74/2021 of Kolathur Police Station, Mettur Taluk, Salem District are registered against the petitioner and that in Crime No.74/2021, the Principal Sessions Judge, Salem enlarged the accused on bail on condition that

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

the petitioner should appear before the Inspector of Police, Kolathur Police Station, Salem daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders.

¶15

3.The specific contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that since three cases are pending against the petitioner, he is unable to appear before three different Police Stations at the same time.

¶16

4.Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court modifies the condition as follows:-

¶17

(a)The petitioner shall appear before the Inspector of Police, Kolathur Police Station, Salem District daily at 10.00 a.m., and sign until further orders.

¶18

(b)Other conditions shall remain intact.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

20/09/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, TIRUPPUR.

¶26

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT (FOR INFORMATION).

¶27

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANGALAM POLICE STATION, TIRUPPUR DISTRICT.

¶28

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLATHUR POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶31

+1 C.C. to M/S. LAW VISION Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.10270

¶32

Order in CRL MP.7989/2021 in CRL OP.9335/2021 Date :20/09/2021

¶33

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶34

INBA 24/09/2021

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Karthik v. State, Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Karthik v. State, Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.v.Radhakrishnan, Vs J.v.Srinivasan

Kannaiappan Vs N.M.Kisthappa Chettiar

M.Prabhavathi Vs K.Chandra

G.Karthik Vs State, Represented by

Narashkumar Vs Stae Rep by

M/S Anusha Engineering Vs M/S Senpal Enginnering