T.M.Natesa Chettiar v. K.Ganesan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the appellant. The court directed dismissal in an earlier notice which remained unchallenged.
What did the court decide?
No order as to costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
S.A.No.562 of 2009
T.M.Natesa Chettiar ... Appellant
Vs
- K.Ganesan 2. G.Gopi 3. G.Ponnurangan
- Illangovan ... Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of code of Civil Procedure praying against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.81 of 2006 dated 04..07.2007 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.II, Ranipet reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.171 of 2000 dated 31.10.2005 on the file of District Munsif, Sholingar.
For Appellant : No Appearance
For Respondents : Mr. A.Gouthaman
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T.M.Natesa Chettiar
- respondent
K.Ganesan
- respondent
G.Gopi
- respondent
G.Ponnurangan
- respondent
Illangovan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court