Kittappa, v. Raja
Case brief
What is this about?
12715, 12718 & 12721 of 2020 in S.A.No.667…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP Nos.12714, 12715, 12718 & 12721 of 2020 in S.A.No.667 of 2011
CMP Nos.12714, 12715, 12718 & 12721 of 2020
in S.A.No.667 of 2011
P.T.ASHA, J
The above applications have been filed (i) to set aside the abatement caused by the death of the first respondent (ii) to appoint 3rd respondent herein as guardian of minor 5th respondent (iii) to condone the delay of 253 days in seeking to set aside the abatement caused by the death of the deceased first respondent and (iv) to bring on record the
respondents 3 to 5 herein as legal representatives of deceased first respondent and rank them as respondents 3 to 5 in the above second appeal.
- The learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 has no objection to these applications being allowed.
- Sufficient reasons have been given in the affidavit filed in support
of the applications and accordingly, these applications are ordered.
- Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment and post
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court