Second Appeal filed by appellants against a judgment confirming a decree in a case involving multiple defendants. The appellants failed to appear with counsel despite notice; the court dismissed the appeal for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.07.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
S.A.No.1032 of 2008
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of code of Civil Procedure praying against the judgment and decree dated 07.02.2008 in A.S.No.55 of 2007, passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem, confirming the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2006 in O.S.No.1548 of 2004 passed by the II Additional District Munsif Court, Salem.
For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.T.Sezhian for R2&R3 Mr.R.Asokan for R15,17,18 to 23 No appearance for R5, 6 to 14, 16, 24 to 37 Not Ready in Notice Respondents 4 & 7,
J U D G M E N T
The counsel who was earlier appearing on behalf of the appellant had filed a memo dated 09.07.2021 stating that his clients viz., the Appellants herein, had taken back the case bundle with the change of vakalat. However, they have not to date entered appearance through another counsel. The matter being listed continuously from 03.06.2021, 25.06.2021 and 13.07.2021 and the matter was directed to be listed today showing the names of the appellants in the cause list.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kal
To
+1cc to Mr.R.Meenal, Advocate, S.R.No.34489
S.A.No.1032 of 2008 BS(CO) HS(24/08/2021)
K.Shanmugam
K.Manickavel
Chinnathayee
Ramakrishnan
Ganesan
Kamala
P.T.Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
