In a Second Appeal under Section 100 of C.P.C., the court noted that the sole appellant was reported dead. The appeal was dismissed as abated, with no costs awarded, and connected matters closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
K.Rathinam .. Appellant/ Defendant
Versus
R.Edwin Sahariah .. Respondent/ Plaintiff
PRAYER:
This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 03.12.2010, made in A.S.No.195 of 2010 on the file of the VII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.796 of 2008 dated 19.02.2010 on the file of XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
It is reported that the sole appellant reported dead. This Second Appeal stands dismissed as abated. It is open to the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant to take necessary steps if so advised. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P is closed.
Sub Assistant Registrar
nvi
To
S.A.No.358 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012
KSM(CO) PM/01/12/2021
K.Rathinam
R.Edwin Sahariah
Justice RMT. Teekaa Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
