Sri .a.Muthumalai Nadar v. He Secretry
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn by consent of the appellant's counsel, who sought and obtained permission for such action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
S.A.No.315 of 2012
A.Muthumalai Nadar ... Appellant/Defendant
Vs.
The Secretary, Chennai East Coast Nadar, Welfare Sangam, represented by its Secretary, P.Gopalakrishnan 127, East Coast Road, Enjambakkam, Chennai. ... Respondent/Plaintiff
PRAYER: This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.52 of 2009 dated 27.09.2010, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tambaram which confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.158 of 2005, passed by the learned District Munsiff Court, Alandur, dated 23.10.2007.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Ranganathan For Respondent : Mr.G.B.Sabaridas
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to with draw this Second Appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Second Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dua
To
1.The Subordinate Judge, Tambaram.
+1cc to Mr.G.Ranganathan, Advocate SR. No.60580
S.A.No.315 of 2012
SPD (CO) PR (07/12/2021)
A.Muthumalai Nadar
The Secretary, Chennai East Coast Nadar, Welfare Sangam
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court