V.Bhaskaran v. S.Murugan
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge bench dismissed a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC as withdrawn by the appellant, leaving no substantive legal proposition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
S.A.No.104 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012
V. Bhaskaran .. Appellant /Defendant
Vs.
S. Murugesan .. Respondent/Plaintiff
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.164 of 2010 dated 01.08.2011 on the file of I Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, confirming the judgment and decree of the learned XII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai made in O.S.No.5982 of 2007 dated 13.11.2009.
For Petitioner : Ms. V.J. Latha
For Respondent : Mr. R. Loganathan
J U D G M E N T
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bhaskaran
- respondent
S. Murugesan
Coram
RMT. TEEEKAA RAMAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court