Dismissed
M.Rajamani v. Shanmughakani
Madras HCSA/314/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the Second Appeal as withdrawn by the appellants, pursuant to a prayer filed by their counsel and an undertaking to file a memo in the Registry.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶2
DATED : 13.09.2021
¶3
CORAM
¶4
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTIC E R. HEMALATHA
¶5
S.A.No. 314 of 2011 and
¶6
M.P. No.1 of 2011
¶7
- M. Rajamani
¶8
- M. Selvaraj
¶9
- Kasturi ... Appellants/Plaintiffs in Trial Court Vs.
¶10
- Shanmughakani
¶11
- Balasubramani
¶12
- Gopalan
¶13
- The Executive Officer Vadalur Town Panchayat Vadalur Town Panchayat Office Vadalur, Cuddalore Taluk Cuddalore District.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
M. Rajamani
- appellant
M. Selvaraj
- appellant
Kasturi
- respondent
Shanmughakani
- respondent
Balasubramani
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court