The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a civil miscellaneous petition for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner and lack of representation on the day of hearing, leaving the petition for dismissal.
The petition is dismissed for default due to failure to appear or file representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Ninth day of September Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MRS JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA
CMP.No.610 of 2011
IN SA.382 of 2003
SRINIVASAN [ PETITIONER ]
Vs
BAKTHAVATCHALAM [ RESPONDENT ]
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 1776 days in filing petition to restore the CMP No.16502 in CMP.SR.No.20430/2005 in SA No.382/2003 [in CMP.No.610 of 2011].
Order : This petition coming on this day for hearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Petitioner not appearing either in person or by an advocate, the court made the following order:-
When this petition was taken up for hearing on 08.09.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Registry was directed to post the matter under the caption "for dismissal" on 09.09.2021. Even today, i.e., 09.09.2021 there is no representation for the petitioner.
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POONAMALLEE 2 THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, POONAMALLEE
Order in CMP.No.610 of 2011 IN SA.382 of 2003 Date :09/09/2021
From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format RA 16/09/2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 1776 days in filing a petition to restore a case.
Srinivasan
Bakthavachalam
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
