Lakshmi v. Shanmugham
Case brief
What is this about?
Two second appeals were dismissed for default as the appellant, who was served with notice, failed to appear and provide instructions to counsel in the High Court of Judicature at Madras on the prescribed date.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeals dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.10.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTIC E R.HEMALATHA
S.A.Nos.150 & 230 of 2010
Lakshmi ... Appellant in both Second Appeals Vs.
- Shanmugham
- Mohanambal 3. Minor Manikandan (Minor represented by next friend Mohanambal)
... Respondents in S.A.No.150 of 2010 1. Shanmugham 2. Mohanambal 3.Chandra ... Respondents in S.A.No.230 of 2010
Prayer in S.A.No.150 of 2010: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 04.12.2007 in A.S. No.15 of 2007, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Mettur, upholding the decree and judgment dated 28.12.2006 in O.S. No.133 of 2002, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Mettur.
Prayer in S.A.No.230 of 2010: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 04.12.2007 in A.S. No.14 of 2007, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Metur, upholding the decree and judgment dated 28.12.2006 in O.S. No.67 of 2003, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Mettur.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Lakshmi
- respondent
Shanmugham
- respondent
Mohanambal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court