Kanagammal v. Dheenan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed a second appeal because the sole appellant died and no legal heirs were impleaded, resulting in abatement.
What did the court decide?
None
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.10.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTIC E R.HEMALATHA
S.A.NO. 1135 OF 2004
Kanagammal ... Appellant/ Appellant/Plaintiff Vs.
1.Deenan 2.Sankar 3.Andalammal 4.Vasanthi 5.Sathishkumar 6.Manikodi 7.Vairavan ... Respondents/ Respondents/Defendants
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 03.10.2002 in A.S. No.147 of 1994, on the file of the Principal District Court, Vellore District, Vellore, upholding the decree and judgment dated 30.08.1994 in O.S. No.184 of 1991, on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Vellore.
For Appellant : M/s.Veena Suresh
For Respondents : No appearance
JUDGMENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kanagammal
- respondent
Deenan
- respondent
Sankar
- respondent
Andalammal
- respondent
Vasanthi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court