The High Court dismissed the Second Appeal as abated. The respondent and the first appellant were deceased, but no legal representatives were brought on record despite notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
S.A.No.1332 of 2008 & M.P.No.1 of 2008
1.P.Mohana Sundaram
2.P.Padmanaban
3.P.Deenadayalan
... Appellants/Appellants/ Defendants 1 to 3
Vs
Vasantha alias Vasantha Gokllam
... Respondent/Respondent/ Plaintiff
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgement and Decree dated 28.11.2005 and made in A.S.No.10 of 2005 on the file of the Fast Tract Court V, Chennai, confirming the Judgement and Decree dated 02.04.2004 and made in O.S.No.13064 of 1996 on the file of XII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
On 03.03.2020, this Court has passed the following order:
“From the notes sheet, it is seen that on 27.11.2019, it has been represented that the sole respondent and the first appellant are dead. However, still no steps have been taken to bring on record the Lrs of the deceased.
Post on 16.03.2020 finally. If no steps are taken the Second Appal stand abated”.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kan
To
Copy to:-
The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madurai – 104.
S.A.No.1332 of 2008
SSD(CO) CT/28/07/2021
1.P.Mohana Sundaram
2.P.Padmanaban
3.P.Deenadayalan
Vasantha alias Vasantha Gokllam
P.T. Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
