Venugopal v. Krishnaveni
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed the Second Appeal (No.797 of 2009) for default as the sole appellant failed to appear or provide representation, having been duly served on 18.05.2021 but remaining absent for this hearing.
What did the court decide?
Dismissing the Second Appeal for default of appearance and closing the connected miscellaneous petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
Second Appeal No.797 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
Venugopal ...Appellant/3rd Defendant Vs.
1.Krishnaveni 2.Sekar ..Respondents 1 & 2/Plaintiff 1 & 2 3.Anbazhagan (The 3rd Respondent given up as he was already set exparte in the Trial Court)
..3rd Respondent/1st Defendant
4.Varadhammal 5.P.Anjali Devi 6.Sarala 7.Nandhakumar 8.P.Prabu 9.P.Paramesvari 10.Durga Ammal 11.Parthasarathy 12.Vijayammal ...Respondents
Prayer:- The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 11.07.2006 made in A.S.No.36 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram District, confirming the Judgement and Decree dated 04.09.1996 made in O.S.No.25 of 1986 on the file of the District Munsif, Chengalpattu.
For Appellant : No Appearance
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Venugopal
- respondent
Krishnaveni
- respondent
Sekar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court