Dismissed

Dr.T.K.S.Villalan v. M/S.Muhurtham Event Management Pvt. Ltd.

Madras HC25 Jan 2021REV.APPL/4/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court received review applications filed by the petitioners seeking review of previous orders. The counsels appeared via video conference and submitted that the review applications were filed only to obtain permission to withdraw them. The court dismissed both applications as withdrawn by the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the review applications was granted implicitly by dismissing the applications as withdrawn.

Dr.T.K.S.Villalan Vs M/S.Muhurtham Event… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 20.07.2021

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA

¶6

Review Application Nos.4 & 5 OF 2021

¶7

in A.No.9492 & 9768 of 2019 Review Application No.4 of 2021 APPICO INVESTMENT PTE. LIMITED, 745, Toa Payoh Lor 5, #01-07 The Actuary, Singapore 319 455 Through the Authorised Representative, Kaikhushru Vicaji Taraporevala Level 42, Six Battery Road, Singapore-049909 ... Petitioner vs. Manickam Mahalingam ... Respondent Review Application No.5 of 2021 1. APPICO INVESTMENT PTE. LIMITED, 745, Toa Payoh Lor 5, # 01-07 The Actuary, Singapore 319 455 Through the Authorised Representative, Kaikhushru Vicaji Taraporevala Level 42, Six Battery Road, Singapore-049909 2. APPICO HITECH PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED, 99, Mool Hitech Industrial Estate, Tambol Ban Lane, Amphur bang Pa-in, Ayutthaya, Thailand – 13160, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Through the Authorised Representative, Kaikhushru Vicaji Taraporevala,

¶8

¶9

Level 42, Six Battery Road, Singapore-049909. ... Petitioners vs. Manickam Mahalingam ... Respondent

¶10

Prayer in Review Application No.4 of 2021 :Review Application has been filed under Section 114 r/w. Order 47, Rule 1 and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure to review the order in Application No.9492 of 2019 dated 02.06.2021. Prayer in Review Application No.5 of 2021 :Review Application has been filed under Section 114 r/w. Order 47, Rule 1 and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure to review the order in Application No.9768 of 2019 dated 02.06.2021.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Sivanandaraj for (in both applications) M/s.Roshan Balasubramanian For Respondent : M/s.A.L.Ganthimathi (in both applications)

¶12

COMMON ORDER

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner who appears before this Court through video conference mode would submit that he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the above review applications.

¶14

Accordingly, both these review applications are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶15

20.07.2021

¶16

Index : Yes

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

kal

P.T.ASHA, J

kal

Review Application Nos.4 & 5 OF 2021
in
A.No.9492 & 9768 of 2019

¶23

20.07.2021

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Dr.T.K.S.Villalan v. M/S.Muhurtham Event Management Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.T.K.S.Villalan v. M/S.Muhurtham Event Management Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Vijayakumar Vs State of Tamil Nadu

The District Collector Vs Hema Anandhan

S.S. Hariharan Vs Commissioner of Milk

Thangavelu Vs Central Govt Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court

Thangavelu Vs State Bank of India

A.Radhakrishnan Vs The Secretary to Government