The petition seeking leave to appeal against an impugned order in W.P. No. 2432 of 2012 was allowed because the original petition was filed by a trade union on behalf of the petitioner.
Leave to file an appeal against the impugned order in W.P. No. 2432 of 2012 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP No.7162 of 2020 in WA SR No.2667 of 2020
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
Learned counsel states that the
impugned order in W.P.No.2432 of
2012 affects the petitioner because it
was filed by a trade union on his
behalf. Accordingly, this petition
seeking leave to file an appeal against
the impugned order is allowed.
(S.B., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.)
25.01.2021
kpl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal is required to be granted when a Writ Petition was originally filed by a trade union on behalf of the petitioner.
Petitioner
Respondent
Sankardevaraman A.
R. Senthil Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
