S.S. Hariharan v. Commissioner of Milk
Case brief
What is this about?
in W.A.No. SR.16537 of 2018 THE HON'BLE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.9146 of 2018 in W.A.No. SR.16537 of 2018
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. The respondents are served and
represented by counsel Mr.R.Bala
Ramesh.
In view of the sufficient cause shown, the delay in preferring the appeal is condoned and the appeal is taken on record. Let appropriate number be allotted to the matter. The appeal will appear a fortnight hence.
(S.B., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.) 22.01.2021
tar
Coram
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court