The court dismissed an undefended Civil Revision Petition based on the consistent non-appearance of the petitioner's counsel and lack of representation on the hearing date.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. Costs not awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.359 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.01.2021
CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.359 of 2014
and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2014
Ramalakshmi ... Petitioner
versus
Gunasekaran ... Respondent
Prayer:Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C. seeking to set aside the order dated 14.09.2013 passed in I.A.No.677 of 2012 in O.S.No.264 of 2008 by the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai.
For Petitioner : No appearance
ORDER
It is seen from the records that the learned counsel for the petitioner has been consistently absent from 31.07.2018 for more than five occasions.
Assistant Registrar (AD II)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
ogy
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/2
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.359 of 2014
To
The II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai.
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.359 of 2014 07.01.2021
KM (21.01.2021) 2P 2C
2/2
Ramalakshmi
Gunasekaran
R. Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
