Allowed

S. P. Keethika Parvathy v. G. Vasanth

Madras HC6 Jan 2021TR CMP(MD)/52/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed a transfer petition under Section 24 CPC, withdrawing a case from the Subordinate Court at Tirunelveli and transferring it to the Subordinate Court at Nagercoil to reduce travel inconvenience for the respondent husband, without costs. Connected petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of H.M.O.P.No.61 of 2019 from Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli to Subordinate Court, Nagercoil.

S. P. Keethika Parvathy Vs G. Vasanth — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.52 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 06.01.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.52 of 2020 and C.M.P(MD) Nos.941 of 2020

¶7

S.P.Keerthika Parvathy ... Petitioner/Respondent

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

G.Vasanth ... Respondent/Petitioner

¶10

Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw in H.M.O.P.No.61 of 2019, on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Tirunelveli and to transfer the same case to the learned Family Judge's Court at Nagercoil for further proceedings.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.L.Victoria Gowri For Respondent : Mr.M.Sankar

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The petitioner/wife seeks transfer of H.M.O.P.No.61 of 2019, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli to the Family Court, Nagercoil.

¶14

Transfer is sought for mainly on the ground of

¶15

convenience of the wife.

¶16

3.Mr.M.Sankar, learned counsel who appeared for the respondent would submit that if the matter is transferred to Family Court, Nagercoil, he will be forced to travel from Tirunelveli to Nagercoil for each and every hearing. The learned counsel would further submit that if H.M.O.P.No.61 of 2019 is transferred to Subordinate Court, Nagercoil, it will be convenient to both the parties and inconvenience caused to the husband would be greatly reduced, as the presence of the parties for every hearing is not required before the Subordinate Court.

¶17

4.Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent, H.M.O.P.No.61 of 2019, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli is withdrawn and transferred to the file of Subordinate Court, Nagercoil to be disposed of in accordance with https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/2

¶19

Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.52 of 2020

¶20

law. The Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli is directed to transmit the papers to the Subordinate Court, Nagercoil forthwith. Accordingly, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. However, there will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions is closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar ()

¶23

// True Copy //

¶24

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶25

vrn

¶26

¶27

1.The Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli.

¶28

2.The Subordinate Court, Nagercoil.

¶29

3.The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, (2 copies) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

Order made in Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.52 of 2020 and C.M.P(MD) Nos.941 of 2020 06.01.2021

¶31

VB (03.02.2021) 2P 5C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

S. P. Keethika Parvathy v. G. Vasanth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. P. Keethika Parvathy v. G. Vasanth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajaboopathy, Vs Kanaga

Kalliammal, Vs Chinnammal

Chellam, Vs Lakshmi (Died), Veerayee (Died), 1. Karuppayee

Muniyammal Vs Segappa Pandiar

Ankala Eswari Alias Rajeshwari Vs Rajkannan

B.Sujitha Vs C.Ashok Raja