T.R.Anwar(Died) v. M.Kamalanathan
Case brief
What is this about?
A single-line order by the Madras High Court dismissing a Civil Revision Petition regarding rent control proceedings as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted; CRP dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
CRP (NPD)No.1789 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.09.2021
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
C.R.P (NPD)No.1789 of 2017 and
C.M.P.Nos.8392 & 17317 of 2017
1.T.R.Anwar (Died)
2.Razhiya Begam
3.Suhale Ahamed
4.Athhar Basha
5.Ansar Basha ..Revision Petitioners
(Petitioners 2 to 5 brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole petitioner viz T.R.Anwar vide Court order dated 16.08.2021 made in C.M.P.No.152 of 2021 in C.R.P.1789 of 2017).
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ansar Basha
- respondent
M.Kamalanathan
Coram
Krishnan Ramasamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court