Dismissed

Elayaperumal v. Anjammal

Madras HC13 Sept 2021CRP/1809/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment dismisses a Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 CPC for non-prosecution. The Bench observed that the petitioner had not taken any steps for four years, indicating a lack of interest, resulting in the dismissal of both the main petition and the connected stay petition.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition and connected Miscellaneous Petition for stay are dismissed for non-prosecution.

Elayaperumal Vs Anjammal — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.R.P.(NPD)No.1809 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.09.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy

¶5

C.R.P (NPD)No.1809 of 2017 and

¶6

C.M.P.No.8927 of 2017

¶7

Elayaperumal .. Revision Petitioner
vs.
Anjammal ..Respondent
PRAYER:

¶8

Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the Fair and Final Order passed in E.P.No.30 of 2016 in O.S.No.261 of 2005, dated 06.07.2016 on the file of the Principal District Munsif (F.A.C) Court, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District.

¶9

For Revision Petitioner - M/S.T.Meganathan, No appearance

¶10

For Respondent - M/s.Pushpa for

¶11

Mr.C.Rajaguru

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

When the matter was taken up on the last occasion, i.e. on

¶14

07.09.2021, none appeared on behalf of the revision petitioner. Hence, this

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶17

C.R.P.(NPD)No.1809 of 2017

¶18

Court directed the Registry to list the matter under the caption “For Dismissal'' on 13.09.2021. Accordingly, the matter is listed today. However, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the revision petitioner, whereas, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent is present.

¶19

This Civil Revision Petition is filed in the year 2017. Thus, for

¶20

the past four years, the revision petitioner has not taken any steps to prosecute the case, which per se shows that he is not interested in pursuing the matter any further.

¶21

Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non

¶22

prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition for stay also stands dismissed.

¶23

13.09.2021

¶24

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking Order jd/sd

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶27

C.R.P.(NPD)No.1809 of 2017

¶28

¶29

The Principal District Munsif, Court, Vridhachalam, Cuddalore District.

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶32

C.R.P.(NPD)No.1809 of 2017

¶33

Krishnan Ramasamy, J., jd/sd

¶34

C.R.P (NPD)No.1809 of 2017
and
C.M.P.No.8927 of 2017
13.09.2021

¶35

4/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Elayaperumal v. Anjammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Elayaperumal v. Anjammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kannaiyan S/O. Balamurugan Vs Periyasamy

Moiz Vs Shabbir Taher Bhai

Sankar, S/O.Ragupathi Chettiar Vs Durai

J.Malarvizhi Vs B.Santhi

Krishnaveni Vs Karunanithi

The Management Vs Sarasu @ Saraswathy