Dismissed

Duraisamy,S/O.K.a.Subbaraya v. Nallasamy Gounder

Madras HC22 Sept 2021CRP NPD/1454/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 CPC for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear despite multiple listings and sanctions of dismissal, leading to the closure of the connected miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Duraisamy,S/O.K.a.Subbaraya Vs Nallasamy Gounder — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 22.09.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy

¶5

C.R.P (NPD)No.1454 of 2003

¶6

and
C.M.P.No.15914 of 2003

¶7

Duraisamy,

¶8

S/o. K.A.Subbaraya Gounder.

¶9

 .. Revision Petitioner

¶10

vs.

¶11

1.Nallaswamy Gounder,
 S/o. Velappa Gounder.

¶12

2.K.A.Subbaraya Gounder .. Respondents

¶13

PRAYER:

¶14

Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the
Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the fair and final order
dated 05.07.2001 made in F.A.No.64/2000 in F.P.No.61/1996 in
O.S.No.203/1994 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Dharapuram
as confirmed by the order in C.M.A.No.89/2000 dated 28.04.2003
on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Erode and to
allow the petition.

¶15

 For Revision Petitioner : M/s.M.Easan - No appearance
 (Change of vakalat filed on 15.11.2016)

¶16

 For Respondent 1 : Mr.A.K.Sridharan - No appearance
 Respondent-2 : Died

¶17

When the matter was listed on 16.07.2020, there was no
representation on behalf of the revision petitioner. Therefore,
this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption
“For Dismissal” on 23.07.2020. Thereafter, the matter was not
listed for one year and it was listed before this Court on

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

22.09.2021, on which date also, none appeared on behalf of the
revision petitioner. The Civil Revision Petition was filed in
the year 2003, aggrieved by the order passed by the Court below,
dated 28.04.2003. It is seen from the endorsements made in the
Order Sheet that the matter has been listed for number of times.
Despite of it, the revision petitioner failed to show any
interest to conduct the case today also and this Court is ''sick
and tired'' of granting adjournments.

¶20

2. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous
Petition is closed. No costs.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar (CS-VIII)

¶23

// True Copy //

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

mka/sd

¶26

To

¶27

1. II Additional District Judge, Erode

¶28

2. The Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram.

¶29

C.R.P (NPD)No.1454 of 2003

¶30

and
C.M.P.No.15914 of 2003

¶31

BP(CO)
B.VC (20/10/2021)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Duraisamy,S/O.K.a.Subbaraya v. Nallasamy Gounder

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Duraisamy,S/O.K.a.Subbaraya v. Nallasamy Gounder

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.R.Anwar(Died) Vs M.Kamalanathan

Palanisamy Vs Marapp Gounder

Rajendiran Vs Kannan

The Chairman Vs Pattupilla

Mrs Samsath Begam Vs P.Arujunan

K.N.Pandian Aged 58, Vs State Bank of India