Anand v. State Represented by
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.RC.No.981 of 2019 and
Crl.M.P.No.13758 of 2019
1. Anand
2. Muniraj
3. Sasikumar
4. Pradeepa ... Petitioners
Vs.
1. State represented by
The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Hosur, Krishnagiri.
(Crime No.233 of 2018)
2. Geetha
(Defacto complainant is suo motu impleaded
as per order in Crl.R.C.No.981/19
dated 26.09.2019) ... Respondents
PRAYER : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401
Cr.P.C. against the order passed by the learned Principal
Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri in Crl.M.P.No.959 of 2019 dated
21.08.2019 in S.C.No.11 of 2019.
For Petitioner :Mr.C.R.Malarvannan
For Respondents :Mr.K.Madhan
Government Advocate (Crl.side)
O R D E R
When this Criminal Revision Petition is taken up for
hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought
permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also
made an endorsement to that effect.
- In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently connected M.P. is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CCC)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
arr
To
The Principal Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri.
Crl.RC.No.981 of 2019
um(co)
ask05/02/2021
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anand
- petitioner
Muniraj
- petitioner
Sasikumar
- petitioner
Pradeepa
- respondent
State represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Police
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court