Petitioner filed a criminal revision challenging an interim maintenance order under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. The Court held it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the revision under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. The petition was rejected as not maintainable.
Revision case rejected as not maintainable; papers returned to counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.RC.No.16 of 2021 and CRL.M.P.No.130 of 2021
Mr.M.Ashok Kumar ...Petitioner
Vs.
G.Sakthi Priya ...Respondent
PRAYER : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 r/w 401
of Cr.P.C to call for the records relating to order made in
M.P.No.250 of 2020 in M.C.No.309 of 2019 dated 05.12.2020 on the
file of the fifth Additional Family Court, Chennai and set aside
the same.
For Petitioner :Mr.D.Padmanabhan
O R D E R
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Fifth Additional Family Court, Chennai in M.P.No.250 of 2020 in M.C.No.309 of 2019 dated 05.12.2020.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS II )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
arr
To
The Judge,
TheV th Additional Family Court, Chennai
Copy to
The Section Officer,
Criminal Section,
High Court, Madras.
Crl.RC.No.16 of 2021
MP(CO)
KKV/11/02/2021
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M. Ashok Kumar
G. Sakthi Priya
P. Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
