Thangaraj v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
In an infructuous Criminal Appeal regarding a bail rejection, the High Court dismissed the appeal as the appellant had already secured bail from the Session Court during the appeal's pendency.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Appeal dismissed as infructuous due to subsequent grant of bail.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.A.No.786 of 2019
Thangaraj ... Appellant/ Sole Accused Vs. 1.State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Karamadai Police Station Coimbatore District (Crime No.223 of 2019) 2.Sujatha ... Respondents/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Appeal filed against the order passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore on 30.10.2019 in C.M.P.No.3576 of 2019 seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.223 of 2019. For Petitioner :No representation For Respondents :Mr.K.Madhan, Govt.Advocate(Criminal Side) for R-1 O R D E R
This Criminal Appeal is filed challenging the dismissal order dated 30.10.2019 passed in C.M.P.No.3576 of 2019 in Crime No.223 of 2019. The petitioner filed bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., seeking bail before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. The Sessions Judge, dismissed the said petition. Therefore, the petitioner/appellant filed this Criminal Appeal.
- There is no representation for the appellant. However, Mr.Madhan, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that during the pendency of this appeal, the appellant/accused already got bail from the Sessions Court.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Page numbers
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Thangaraj
- respondent
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police
- respondent
Sujatha
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court